Validation library

Benchmark examples for residential shear-wall report workflows.

This page organizes validation examples that ShearWise Pro can use to compare known inputs against expected outputs. Use it to document software version, input file, hand calculation, expected result, and reviewer notes.

Start a Three-Report Trial
Solid wall

One-story wall with no openings

Checks average shear, panel schedule selection, hold-down demand, and report formatting.

Opening

Wall with one window or door

Checks full-height segment generation, FTAO/collector callouts, and opening labels in elevation.

2-story

Stacked and unstacked upper walls

Checks transfer provided vs transfer required status, floor-line straps, and second-story load path notes.

Drift

Passing and failing drift examples

Checks story drift status, allowable ratio, Cd amplification, and plan-checker warning output.

High demand

Large opening / limited shear length

Checks auto-fix recommendations, high-capacity options, and connector warnings.

Code pack

ASCE 7-22 and ASCE 7-16 comparison

Checks report code-basis output, hazard inputs, and formula trace consistency by selected code pack.

Recommended validation matrix

TestPurposeExpected OutputStatus
SW-001 Solid WallPanel and hold-down baselineDemand, capacity, connector, and formula trace match expected tolerance.Template ready
SW-002 One OpeningOpening segmentation and FTAOOpening displayed on elevation; FTAO/collector force listed where applicable.Template ready
SW-003 Multiple Wall LinesFlexible / rigid / envelope distributionWall-line force table identifies governing envelope demand.Template ready
SW-004 Two-Story TransferUnstacked upper wall transferTransfer provided when strap is calculated; transfer required when no connector passes.Template ready
SW-005 Plan Checker SummaryAHJ review output1-page summary lists code basis, max shear, max connector, drift, transfer, and warning status.Template ready
Professional use note: validation examples are intended to document repeatability and review quality. They do not remove the need for Engineer of Record verification, local amendments, current manufacturer catalogs, and project-specific load-path review.